Legal

Test the case
before the case tests you.

Accurately simulate how each consequential person is likely to think, feel, say, and act. See the pressure point before it reaches the room.

Request a private briefing Enter the case room ↓

Matter 24-018Private simulation

Before the room.
Three pressure points found.

Juror 07Motive is still unclear.

Witness W2“Always” breaks on the March exception.

JudgeThe narrower argument lands.

28 sources attachedReview with counsel

See the first reaction

The private case room

One case.
Every mind that can change it.

Choose a seat. Their Mind Twin predicts how that person is likely to hear the case, what they may challenge, and what to test next—grounded in the record.

Matter 24-018 · activeConfidential workspace28 sources connected

Simulated jurorPredicted response · record-grounded

Today 9:41 AM

The company broke its promise, then hid the cost.

Delivered

I see the breach. But I still don’t see how the later forecast proves intent.

✦ MindTwins surfaced the pressure point

Person-response predictionEvidence attachedCounsel decides

Experienced firsthand

They saw the pressure point.Before the room.

Trial counsel and independent AI evaluators saw MindTwins surface how a judge may receive an argument, how a person communicates, and where the analysis deserves a closer look.

Individually backed byPeople who know category-defining companies.

Steve AndersonFounder, Baseline Ventures

Ali RowghaniManaging Director, Y Combinator

Naval RavikantCo-founder, AngelList

Scott BelskyChief Product Officer, Adobe

Eric PaleyPartner, Founder Collective

Firsthand MindTwins experience

“This is one of the most effective tools I’ve ever seen. It showed me this judge won’t understand the big picture, so you have to lead with the law.”

Aaron WattsAttorney · Watts Law

Firsthand reactions and individual backing. Company names identify experience; no institutional endorsement is implied.

Witness preparation

Change one phrase.
See what holds.

Rehearse how the witness is likely to respond. Replace fragile absolutes with language the record can support.

Fragile under pressure

Witness rehearsalMatter 24-018

Private rehearsal

You always followed the protocol, correct?

Delivered

I usually did. But there was an exception in March.

✦“Always” turns one exception into a credibility problem.

Record grounding 28 sources connected

EX-014

Services agreement§ 4.2 · Performance standard

Cited

DEP-02

Operations testimonypp. 88–94 · Exception process

Linked

EX-031

Contemporaneous forecastQ3 · Assumptions and variance

Linked

Boundary visible One assertion is unsupported in the selected record.

Proof beside every prediction

See the response.
See what shaped it.

Every predicted reaction stays tied to the evidence and assumptions behind it—so your team can trust it, challenge it, or reject it.

90%Predictive correctnessInternal human cross-checksPerson-response accuracy—not verdict accuracy

Inspect the full benchmarks

Internal benchmark comparing Mind Twin predictions with responses from the people modeled. Results may vary with the person, context, source quality, and how current the source material is.

From record to decision

From raw record to a strategy ready for the room.

Theory

See where each story breaks.

Predict how each consequential person may hear the competing theories—and where the record stops supporting them.

3 theories compared

Built for consequential work

Know more. Keep counsel in control.

Private by matter

Sensitive work stays contained.

Evidence attached

Every source and assumption stays inspectable.

Counsel decides

MindTwins prepares. Your team makes the call.

Find the pressure point. Shape the stronger case.

Request a private briefing →SOC 2 · HIPAA · GDPR ↗

Test the casebefore the case tests you.

One case.Every mind that can change it.